IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/34948.html

We've Got You Covered: Firms' Political Stances on Abortion and Labor Market Sorting

Author

Listed:
  • Pawel Adrjan
  • Svenja Gudell
  • Emily E. Nix
  • Allison Shrivastava
  • Evan P. Starr
  • Evan P. Starr

Abstract

Amidst rising political polarization, firms engage more frequently with political issues through public statements and policies. This paper examines how firms' stances on polarizing issues impact worker sorting, leveraging announcements from hundreds of employers following the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson, overturning federal abortion rights. We introduce a methodology to uncover labor market competitors for each announcing firm based on job seekers' revealed preferences. While announcing firms received more applications from job seekers, particularly in Democratic-leaning states and female-dominated jobs where abortion was outlawed, current employees began searching for jobs elsewhere as employee satisfaction declined, particularly among male-dominated jobs. Smaller companies with less-established reputations experienced the largest effects. When deciding whether to take a sociopolitical stance, firms face a complicated trade-off: attracting culturally-aligned workers at the expense of alienating current ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Pawel Adrjan & Svenja Gudell & Emily E. Nix & Allison Shrivastava & Evan P. Starr & Evan P. Starr, 2026. "We've Got You Covered: Firms' Political Stances on Abortion and Labor Market Sorting," NBER Working Papers 34948, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34948
    Note: POL
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w34948.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J0 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.