IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/34094.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Feeling Rich or Looking Rich? Quantifying Self-Image and Social-Image Motives

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas L. Bottan
  • Ricardo Perez-Truglia
  • Hitoshi Shigeoka
  • Katsunori Yamada

Abstract

Preferences for status are typically attributed to two distinct channels: self-image, in which individuals derive utility from being richer than others, and social-image, in which individuals value being seen as richer by others. While both channels are believed to be at play, little is known about their relative importance. We address this gap using a hypothetical discrete choice experiment. Our findings indicate that self-image is at most 19.3% as important as social-image. Additionally, we document substantial heterogeneity in the strength of these preferences across individuals and domains.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas L. Bottan & Ricardo Perez-Truglia & Hitoshi Shigeoka & Katsunori Yamada, 2025. "Feeling Rich or Looking Rich? Quantifying Self-Image and Social-Image Motives," NBER Working Papers 34094, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34094
    Note: PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w34094.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.