IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/33357.html

Can Accreditation Improve Quality?: Experimental Evidence from U.S. Jails

Author

Listed:
  • Marcella Alsan
  • Crystal S. Yang

Abstract

Governments often rely on third-party oversight to assure service quality that is difficult to contract upon. We study accreditation of healthcare services in U.S. jails, where care is typically delivered by private contractors and overseen by elected sheriffs with limited medical expertise. In a multi-year randomized controlled trial across U.S. jails, we randomly offered subsidized accreditation from a third-party organization that sets quality standards, provides implementation guidance, and assesses compliance. The offer raises compliance with quality standards by approximately 10 percent, driven by improvement in standards for personnel training and patient care and treatment. We also find reductions in mortality that may reflect organizational changes extending beyond compliance with measured standards. In particular, accreditation improves coordination between custody and medical staff and strengthens managerial oversight by making healthcare practices more observable through documentation and facilitating information flows from staff to supervisors. Our findings suggest that accreditation can improve performance even where regulatory and financial incentives are weak.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcella Alsan & Crystal S. Yang, 2025. "Can Accreditation Improve Quality?: Experimental Evidence from U.S. Jails," NBER Working Papers 33357, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33357
    Note: EH LE PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w33357.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.