IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/32785.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Firm Responses to Uncertainty and Implications for Workers: Experimental Evidence from Uganda During the Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Livia Alfonsi
  • Vittorio Bassi
  • Imran Rasul
  • Elena Spadini

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic represents one of the most rapid and severe shocks to hit global labor markets. We study how firms reacted to the heightened uncertainty and consequences for workers, in a developing country economy: Uganda. Our analysis is based on a panel of firms and workers, tracked from 2012 to 2022, including high frequency surveys during the pandemic. We find that firms’ common response to the heightened uncertainty of the pandemic was to immediately lay off the highest earning workers, that is, the most experienced or skilled employees. We then study the differential impacts of such firm survival strategies on workers’ labor market dynamics across the skills distribution, exploiting the fact that we randomly assigned individuals to the offer of vocational training in 2013. We find that high skill trained workers, who enjoyed better labor market outcomes pre-pandemic, were more likely to be laid off early in the pandemic given firm’s survival strategies. However, trained workers recovered from this job loss and were resilient to the shock. Cumulatively over the pandemic, trained workers spend 61% more time employed than untrained controls, and earn 17% more. Hence, the returns to training survive the pandemic. The mechanisms driving the resilience of trained workers are the certifiability of their skills and their greater accumulation of sector-specific experience, both of which enable them to switch employers within the same sector during the crisis. Our findings provide new insights on firm responses to fast-moving aggregate shocks in low-income settings, consequences for workers’ labor market trajectories, and drivers of the returns to training in good times and bad.

Suggested Citation

  • Livia Alfonsi & Vittorio Bassi & Imran Rasul & Elena Spadini, 2024. "Firm Responses to Uncertainty and Implications for Workers: Experimental Evidence from Uganda During the Pandemic," NBER Working Papers 32785, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32785
    Note: DEV LS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w32785.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Avdeenko & Jakob Gärtner & Marc Gillaizeau & Ghida Karbala & Laura Montenbruck & Giulia Montresor & Atika Pasha & Galina Zudenkova, 2025. "The Power of Faith: Effects of an Imam-led Information Campaign on Labor Supply and Social Interactions," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_621, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.