IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/32124.html

An Equivalence Test Approach to Rounding Parameter Estimates

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Astier
  • Frank A. Wolak

Abstract

Empirical researchers routinely face a simple but consequential reporting decision: how many digits to display for estimated coefficients and associated standard errors? We first document current practice, which consists in always reporting a fixed number of decimal digits, most often three, for all parameter estimates and standard errors. We propose an alternative approach to determine the number of digits to report. Specifically, we introduce the concept of a “distinct” digit and recommend reporting digits in parameter estimates up to the first non-distinct digit. Our rounding heuristic is straightforward to implement and already embedded in a widely used R package.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Astier & Frank A. Wolak, 2024. "An Equivalence Test Approach to Rounding Parameter Estimates," NBER Working Papers 32124, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32124
    Note: EEE IO
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w32124.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.