IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbb/docwpp/201406-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Claude Mathys

    (National Bank of Belgium, Microeconomic Information Department)

Abstract

This paper is an annual publication issued by the Microeconomic Analysis service of the National Bank of Belgium. The Flemish maritime ports (Antwerp, Ghent, Ostend, Zeebrugge), the Autonomous Port of Liège and the port of Brussels play a major role in their respective regional economies and in the Belgian economy, not only in terms of industrial activity but also as intermodal centers facilitating the commodity flow. This update paper provides an extensive overview of the economic importance and development of the Flemish maritime ports, the Liège port complex and the port of Brussels for the period 2007 - 2012, with an emphasis on 2012. Focusing on the three major variables of value added, employment and investment, the report also provides some information based on the social balance sheet and an overview of the financial situation in these ports as a whole. These observations are linked to a more general context, along with a few cargo statistics. Annual accounts data from the Central Balance Sheet Office were used for the calculation of direct effects, the study of financial ratios and the analysis of the social balance sheet. The indirect effects of the activities concerned were estimated in terms of value added and employment, on the basis of data from the National Accounts Institute. As a result of the underlying calculation method the changes of indirect employment and indirect value added can differ from one another. (...) Following the 2009 decline and the improvement in 2011, maritime traffic in the Flemish ports began falling again in 2012. That applies to all the Flemish ports. Value added was rising in the maritime cluster of the Flemish ports and falling in the non-maritime cluster where trade and industry were in decline. Direct value added has risen in the ports of Antwerp and Ostend whereas it has fallen in the ports of Zeebrugge and Ghent. Conversely, direct employment was expanding in both clusters in the Flemish ports viewed as a whole and in each port taken individually. The decline in investment in the Flemish ports continued in 2012. That trend is evident in all the Flemish ports except the port of Ostend where investment was maintained in 2012. The volume of cargo handled in the port of Liège decreased in 2012. Direct value added and employment contracted in both clusters. The steel giant ArcelorMittal had idled two blast furnaces at the site in Liege. Investment increased in both clusters in the Liège port complex. The volume of cargo handled at the port of Brussels declined in 2012. Value added and employment in the maritime cluster fell but rose in the non-maritime cluster. The drop in investment recorded since 2009 continued throughout 2012, albeit at a slowing pace. This report provides a comprehensive account of these issues, giving details for each economic sector, although the comments are confined to the main changes that occurred in 2012.

Suggested Citation

  • Claude Mathys, 2014. "Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2012," Working Paper Document 260, National Bank of Belgium.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbb:docwpp:201406-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nbb.be/doc/ts/publications/wp/wp260en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Vivet, 2013. "Results and financial situation of firms in 2012," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iii, pages 77-99, December.
    2. P. Heuse, 2013. "The 2012 social balance sheet," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iii, pages 101-137, December.
    3. David Vivet, 2011. "Development of a financial health indicator based on companies’ annual accounts," Working Paper Document 213, National Bank of Belgium.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ch. Piette & M.-D. Zachary, 2015. "Sensitivity to the crisis of SME financing in Belgium," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iii, pages 31-45, December.
    2. P. Heuse, 2016. "The 2014 social balance sheet," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue i, pages 85-116, June.
    3. Claude Mathys, 2012. "Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2010," Working Paper Document 225, National Bank of Belgium.
    4. repec:nbb:docwpp:201307-12 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Claude Mathys, 2017. "Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels - Report 2015," Working Paper Research 321, National Bank of Belgium.
    6. Helga Dedoncker, 2017. "Economic importance of the logistics sector in Belgium," Working Paper Research 325, National Bank of Belgium.
    7. Helga Dedoncker, 2017. "Economic importance of the logistics sector in Belgium," Working Paper Research 325, National Bank of Belgium.
    8. Frank Van Nieuwenhove, 2015. "Economic Importance Of The Belgian Ports : Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2013," Working Paper Research 283, National Bank of Belgium.
    9. Claude Mathys, 2013. "Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2011," Working Paper Document 242, National Bank of Belgium.
    10. Claude Mathys, 2017. "Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels - Report 2015," Working Paper Research 321, National Bank of Belgium.
    11. repec:nbb:docwpp:201207-17 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    branch survey; maritime cluster; subcontracting; indirect effects; transport; intermodality; public investments;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods
    • R34 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Input Demand Analysis
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:docwpp:201406-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bnbgvbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.