IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/878eaa9c1a984d1487379a588dd6a89d.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Logic Models to Guide the Planning and Evaluation of Complex Initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Felicia Hurwitz
  • Andrew Burwick

Abstract

This brief highlights how logic models can be an effective tool for guiding the planning and evaluation of complex initiatives, especially those that aim to promote equity for children and families and ultimately improve child well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Felicia Hurwitz & Andrew Burwick, "undated". "Using Logic Models to Guide the Planning and Evaluation of Complex Initiatives," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 878eaa9c1a984d1487379a588, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:878eaa9c1a984d1487379a588dd6a89d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/earlychildhood/2019/using-logic-models-brief.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Montague, Steve & Porteous, Nancy L., 2013. "The case for including reach as a key element of program theory," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 177-183.
    2. Jessica F. Harding & Diane Paulsell, "undated". "Improving Access to Early Care and Education: An Equity-Focused Policy Research Agenda," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4b1f9a43dcd34726b4e646288, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Bernstein & Natalie Reid & Jeffrey Harrington & Lizabeth Malone, "undated". "Head Start’s Interaction with Federal, State, and Local Systems," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 66df57e506ca4057aa877b493, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:878eaa9c1a984d1487379a588dd6a89d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.