Non-Uniform Consumption Taxes: A 'Blunt Redistributive Instrument'?
This paper examines the question of the extent to which redistribution can be achieved using a structure of consumption taxes differential rates and exemptions. A local measure of progression, that of liability progression (equivalent to the revenue elasticity) is examined. Results are obtained for the Australian indirect tax structure and forms in which only those commodity groups with total expenditure elasticities greater than 1 are taxed. Comparison are also made using equivalent variations, and inequality measures of a money metric welfare measure are reported.
|Date of creation:||2001|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||This paper has now been published in: Creedy, J. (2001) Indirect Tax Reform and the Role of Exemptions, Fiscal Studies, 22, no.4, pp. 457-486.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 4th Floor, FBE Building, Level 4, 111 Barry Street. Victoria, 3010, Australia|
Phone: +61 3 8344 5355
Fax: +61 3 8344 6899
Web page: http://fbe.unimelb.edu.au/economics
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mlb:wpaper:785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Katherine Perez)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.