Push or Pull? The relationship Between Development, Trade and Resource Endowment
We develop a model that combines both the transaction efficiency and primary resource explanations for specialization and development. Our model builds on the Yang (1990) framework but introduces a primary resource factor into this model. We show that neither a labour surplus nor the development of efficient trading institutions, by themselves, may be sufficient for the evolution of specialization. Rather, specialization and development is most likely to occur when there is a correct balance between these two factors. By combining the labour surplus 'push' theory of specialization with the transaction efficiency 'pull' theory, our model provides a more complete explanation of the pattern of development observed in a variety of countries.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||1998|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +61 3 8344 5355
Fax: +61 3 8344 6899
Web page: http://www.economics.unimelb.edu.au
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mlb:wpaper:653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Aminata Doumbia)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.