IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mil/wpdepa/2006-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Constitution, cohesion: conflicting views from the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • J. BLAŽEK

Abstract

The aim of the paper is firstly provision of an analysis of the perception of the EU a year after the accession. It is shown that the population of the Czech Republic is shortly after accession rather sceptic about the EU integration. This serves as a context for a discussion the European Constitutional Treaty which proceeded both among public and politicians until French and Dutch NO in late Spring 2005. Finally, some observations are made on relation between Constitution and cohesion.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Blažek, 2006. "Constitution, cohesion: conflicting views from the Czech Republic," Departmental Working Papers 2006-04, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    • Handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2006-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wp.demm.unimi.it/files/wp/2006/DEMM-2006_004wp.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU Constitution; Cohesion policy; Czech Republic;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • P11 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2006-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: DEMM Working Papers (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damilit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.