IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mea/meawpa/11243.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gleitender Ãœbergang in die Rente durch Flexibilisierung der Teilrente

Author

Listed:
  • Gasche, Martin
  • Krolage, Carla

    (Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA))

Abstract

Vor dem Hintergrund der Anhebung der gesetzlichen Altersgrenzen wird oft eine Verbesserung der Möglichkeiten des gleitenden Übergangs in die Rente für diejenigen gefordert, die im Alter nicht mehr so viel arbeiten wollen oder können. In dieser Studie werden Optionen eines gleitenden Übergangs miteinander verglichen. Es zeigt sich, dass die weitaus beliebteste Option der Altersteilzeit gegenüber der kaum wahrgenommenen Teilrente aus der Sicht des Versicherten keine wesentlichen Vorteile aufweist. Der große Nachteil der Teilrente sind die starren Stufen und die komplizierte Berechnung der Hinzuverdienstgrenzen. Durch eine Abschaffung der Stufen könnte die Attraktivität des Teilrentenbezugs und des Hinzuverdiensts wesentlich erhöht und die Altersteilzeit zumindest aus der Sicht des Versicherten obsolet werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Gasche, Martin & Krolage, Carla, 2011. "Gleitender Ãœbergang in die Rente durch Flexibilisierung der Teilrente," MEA discussion paper series 11243, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
  • Handle: RePEc:mea:meawpa:11243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mea.mpisoc.mpg.de/uploads/user_mea_discussionpapers/1169_243-11komplett.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:mea:meawpa:12256 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Börsch-Supan, Axel & Gasche, Martin & Haupt, Marlene & Kluth, Sebastian & Rausch, Johannes, 2012. "Ökonomische Analyse des Rentenreformpakets der Bundesregierung," MEA discussion paper series 201205, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    3. repec:mea:meawpa:12252 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Gasche, Martin, 2012. "Alte und neue Wege zur Berechnung der Rentenabschläge," MEA discussion paper series 201201, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    5. Songül Tolan, 2015. "Die Flexibilisierung des Rentenübergangs in Deutschland," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 82, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mea:meawpa:11243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henning Frankenberger (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.mea.mpisoc.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.