IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mcm/deptwp/1999-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evidence of Construct Validity for Stoke and Arthritis in a Population Health Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Grootendorst
  • David Feeney
  • W. Furlong

Abstract

Background The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is a comprehensive, compact health status classification and health state preference system. The HUI3 system has been implemented in 4 Canadian population health surveys. Objectives To evaluate the construct validity of the HUI3 for the measurement of health related quality of life (HRQL) and attribute-specific morbidity of respondents to the 1990 Ontario Health Survey reported to have arthritis or stroke. We tested (1) whether those with stroke, arthritis, and both conditions had lower HRQL than those with neither condition; (2) whether HUI3 detects morbidity in specific health attributes affected by arthritis and stroke. We expected stroke to affect primarily speech and cognition, arthritis to affect primarily pain and neither condition to affect vision or hearing. Research Design Linear regression models of global HRQL, 8 measures of attribute-specific utilities and logit regression models of 8 measures of attribute-specific functional disability were estimated as a function of 3 illness indicators (stroke only, arthritis only, both) and a set of variables included to reduce confounding. Results Subjects with stroke, arthritis and both conditions had substantially lower HRQL than those with neither condition. Stroke subjects had greater morbidity in speech and cognition than arthritics; somewhat surprisingly stroke subjects endured burdens of pain similar to arthritics; neither condition affected vision or hearing. The tests were robust to several different model specifications. Conclusions The HUI3 system appears to be valid for the measurement of health status and HRQL for stroke and arthritis.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Grootendorst & David Feeney & W. Furlong, 1999. "Evidence of Construct Validity for Stoke and Arthritis in a Population Health Survey," Department of Economics Working Papers 1999-09, McMaster University.
  • Handle: RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1999-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/econ/rsrch/papers/archive/99-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Franks & Erica I. Lubetkin & Joy Melnikow, 2007. "Do personal and societal preferences differ by socio-demographic group?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 319-325.
    2. Steven Prus & Zhiqiu Lin, 2005. "Ethnicity and Health: An Analysis of Physical Health Differences across Twenty-one Ethnocultural Groups in Canada," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 143, McMaster University.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1999-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/demcmca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.