IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Evidence of Construct Validity for Stoke and Arthritis in a Population Health Survey

Listed author(s):
  • Paul Grootendorst
  • David Feeney
  • W. Furlong

Background The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is a comprehensive, compact health status classification and health state preference system. The HUI3 system has been implemented in 4 Canadian population health surveys. Objectives To evaluate the construct validity of the HUI3 for the measurement of health related quality of life (HRQL) and attribute-specific morbidity of respondents to the 1990 Ontario Health Survey reported to have arthritis or stroke. We tested (1) whether those with stroke, arthritis, and both conditions had lower HRQL than those with neither condition; (2) whether HUI3 detects morbidity in specific health attributes affected by arthritis and stroke. We expected stroke to affect primarily speech and cognition, arthritis to affect primarily pain and neither condition to affect vision or hearing. Research Design Linear regression models of global HRQL, 8 measures of attribute-specific utilities and logit regression models of 8 measures of attribute-specific functional disability were estimated as a function of 3 illness indicators (stroke only, arthritis only, both) and a set of variables included to reduce confounding. Results Subjects with stroke, arthritis and both conditions had substantially lower HRQL than those with neither condition. Stroke subjects had greater morbidity in speech and cognition than arthritics; somewhat surprisingly stroke subjects endured burdens of pain similar to arthritics; neither condition affected vision or hearing. The tests were robust to several different model specifications. Conclusions The HUI3 system appears to be valid for the measurement of health status and HRQL for stroke and arthritis.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by McMaster University in its series Department of Economics Working Papers with number 1999-09.

in new window

Date of creation: Sep 1999
Handle: RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1999-09
Contact details of provider: Postal:
1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M4

Phone: (905) 525-9140 ext. 22765
Fax: (905) 521-8232
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1999-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.