IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mcl/mclwop/2006-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On The Non-Robustness Of Nash Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Takashi Kunimoto

    ()

Abstract

I consider the implementation problem under complete information and employ Nash equilibrium as a solution concept. A socially desirable rule is given as a correspondence from the set of states to the set of outcomes. This social choice rule is said to be implementable in Nash equilibrium if there exists a mechanism such that all (pure strategy)Nash equilibrium outcomes are socially desirable. Maskin (1999) clarified the conditions on the social choice rules under which he was able to construct a general Nash implementing mechanism when there are at least three players. This paper identifies the minimal amount of incomplete information which prevents the Maskinian mechanism from being robustly implemented in Nash equilibrium. More precisely, with mild constrains on the social choice rules, one can construct a canonical perturbation of the complete information structure under which a sequence of Bayesian Nash equilibria of the Maskinian mechanism supports a non-Nash equilibrium outcome in the limit of the space of the original complete information structure. Therefore, there is a minimal sense in which the Maskinian mechanism is not robust to incomplete information. This non-robustness result is also extended to the environment with two players.

Suggested Citation

  • Takashi Kunimoto, 2006. "On The Non-Robustness Of Nash Implementation," Departmental Working Papers 2006-25, McGill University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:mcl:mclwop:2006-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://home.mcgill.ca/files/economics/onthenon.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcl:mclwop:2006-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shama Rangwala). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/demcgca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.