IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lat/legeco/e2012-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Patrimonialisation de la vitiviniculture et développement du tourisme dans les régions viticoles Une comparaison Bourgogne / Champagne

Author

Listed:
  • Marie DELAPLACE

    (Université de Paris-Est Marne la Vallée)

  • Elsa GATELIER

    (Université de Reims)

  • Marie-Claude PICHERY

    () (LEG/AMIE, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne)

Abstract

(VF)La « Bourgogne » et la « Champagne » évoquent toutes deux des vins de qualité. Mais ces deux régions hôtes de l’activité vitivinicole ne profitent pas de la même notoriété, particulièrement en tant que destination touristique. La présence d’un patrimoine vitivinicole au sein d’une région, fusse-t-il prestigieux, ne suffit pas à générer un « panier de biens et services territorialisés » au sens de Pecqueur (2001) qui puisse être à l’origine d’une dynamique touristique. L’objectif de cette communication est d’expliquer cet inégal développement entre les deux régions afin d’identifier les conditions dans lesquelles une dynamique peut s’enclencher. Pour ce faire, nous proposons une analyse fondée sur la prise en compte de trois éléments : la nature des patrimoines vitivinicoles et leur degré d’ancrage territorial, le caractère « conjoint » ou « disjoint » des patrimoines locaux, et enfin l’implication des acteurs locaux dans la dynamique œnotouristique.(VA)"Burgundy" and "Champagne" evoke both quality wines. These two regions which host wine business do not take advantage of the same reputation especially as a tourist destination. The presence of a prestigious wine heritage within a region is not sufficient to generate a "basket of territorialized goods and services" (in the sense proposed by Pecqueur, 2001) which can be the cause of a dynamics for tourism. The objective of this paper is to explain such an unequal development between these two regions in order to identify the conditions under which a dynamics can engage. We propose an analysis based on the consideration of three factors: the nature of the wine heritages and their degree of territorial anchoring, the character "joined" or "disjoined" of local heritages and finally the involvement of local actors in the dynamics in wine tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie DELAPLACE & Elsa GATELIER & Marie-Claude PICHERY, 2012. "Patrimonialisation de la vitiviniculture et développement du tourisme dans les régions viticoles Une comparaison Bourgogne / Champagne," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2012-01, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
  • Handle: RePEc:lat:legeco:e2012-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://leg.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/wp%202012-01-%20pichery%20et%20alii.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    (VF)Bourgogne; Champagne; Patrimoine vitivinicole; Œnotourisme; Panier de biens et services territorialisé.(VA)Burgundy; Champagne; wine heritage; wine tourism; basket of territorialized goods and services territorialized.;

    JEL classification:

    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco
    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lat:legeco:e2012-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Odile Ferry). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/latecfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.