Lender Liability and Cleanup Procudure: A Comparison
There are several judicial cases under the US environmental law, in which a lending bank is liable for cleaning up environmentally hazardous materials generated by its borrowing firm. Such a liability rule, so-called lender liability, is applied to a lending bank which has been actively involved in the management of the firm. We first show that the application of lender liability does not necessarily lead to the first-best allocation if the cleanup cost per material depends on an agent who conducts the cleanup. This particularly holds true if the cleanup cost to the entrepreneur is the smallest. We then show that lender liability can lead to the first-best allocation if the bank captures the firm's control right before the environmental agency intervenes.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2002|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/eng/index.html
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kyo:wpaper:561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ryo Okui)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.