IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iwe/workpr/172.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

R and D, and competitiveness in the enlarged EU: the role of the state and financing

Author

Listed:
  • Istvan Korosi

    (Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Technological development during recent decades has led to increased world-market competition. The material-intensive, medium-quality products of a technological level with low intellectual content are not only loosing value at a rapid pace but even tend to suffer the absolute loss of their markets. The world-market position of the countries supplying such products is ever weaker. During the 1990–2004 period, the efficiency of technological development and the innovative capacity of the economy had an ever stronger effect on world-market position. The tendency is also prevalent at the turn of the millennium. The EU countries dedicate different ratios of their GDP to R and D, and the efficiency of technological development also varies from country to country. The enlargement of the European Union in 2004 has significantly increased the community’s potential in terms of human capital, scientific research, intellectual products and qualified manpower. Despite the enlargement of the EU, its total R and D investment has only grown to a limited extent. The state has the primary task to enhance scientific research and inventions by spending the highest possible amount on R and D to have results that can be turned into marketable products by innovation, thereby enabling the economy to catch up with the required level and to develop further. The products and services gained in this way lead to an increased world-market share and improved terms of trade. However, due to limited public financial resources the role of the corporate sector in financing R and D is ever increasing. This role can be greatly enhanced by any country if its economic policy and the characteristic features of its research policy are aimed at stimulating R and D.

Suggested Citation

  • Istvan Korosi, 2006. "R and D, and competitiveness in the enlarged EU: the role of the state and financing," IWE Working Papers 172, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vgi.krtk.hu/publikacio/no-172-2006-12/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horst Penzkofer & Wolfgang Ochel, 1996. "Internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und ihre Implikationen für die europäische FuE-Politik," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 49(10), pages 03-11, October.
    2. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2004. "Technológiai fejlődés, szakosodás, komplementaritás, szerkezetátalakulás [Technological development, technological complementarity and structural change]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 362-378.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Székely-Doby, András, 2006. "Vernon és a számítógép. Az információs technológiai forradalom és a termékciklus-hipotézis összefüggései [Vernon and the computer. Connections between the information technology revolution and the ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 812-826.
    2. Lengyel, Balázs & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2008. "A magyar gazdaság tudásalapú szerveződésének mérése. Az innovációs rendszerek szinergiáinak térbelisége [Measuring the knowledge base of the Hungarian economy: spatial characteristics of innovation," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 522-547.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kanász Mária (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vkhashu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.