The New Growth Theory: Some Intellectual Growth Accounting
This paper discusses the reasons for the success of the New Growth theory. Given that the NGT has a somewhat tautological quality, that its essential ideas have been known for a long time, and that it does not make contact with a large literature on institutions and economic change, its strong success is arguably surprising. At any rate, it causes problems for models of scientific change that focus on novel facts as a criterion of progress, such as Lakatos'. The success of the NGT is better explained by, for example, Laudan's focus on increased problem-solving ability as an important cause of scientific change
|Date of creation:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.cbs.dk/forskning_viden/fakulteter_institutter_centre/institutter/oekonomi/ivs/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ivs:iivswp:97-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (J. Petur Joensen)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.