The New Growth Theory: Some Intellectual Growth Accounting
This paper discusses the reasons for the success of the New Growth theory. Given that the NGT has a somewhat tautological quality, that its essential ideas have been known for a long time, and that it does not make contact with a large literature on institutions and economic change, its strong success is arguably surprising. At any rate, it causes problems for models of scientific change that focus on novel facts as a criterion of progress, such as Lakatos'. The success of the NGT is better explained by, for example, Laudan's focus on increased problem-solving ability as an important cause of scientific change
|Date of creation:|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.cbs.dk/forskning_viden/fakulteter_institutter_centre/institutter/oekonomi/ivs/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ivs:iivswp:97-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (J. Petur Joensen)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask J. Petur Joensen to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.