Some Experimental Evidence on the Coate and Loury Model of Affirmative Action
Coate and Loury (1993) suggest the impact of affirmative action on a negative stereotype is theoretically ambiguous leading to either: a benign equilibrium in which affirmative action eradicates the negative stereotype leading to equal proportional representation of the two groups; or alternatively a patronising equilibrium in which the stereotype persists. The current paper examines this theoretical ambiguity within the context of an experimental design. Although benign and patronising equilibria are equally plausible in theory, the experiments easily replicate the benign equilibrium, but find that a certainty effect leads to over-investment and divergence from the theoretically predicted patronising equilibrium.
|Date of creation:||Jul 2007|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Cavanaugh Hall 516, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202|
Phone: (317) 274-4756
Fax: (317) 274-2347
Web page: http://www.iupui.edu/~econ/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iup:wpaper:wp200701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ye Zhang)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.