The Paradox of Interest Rates of the Greenback Era: A Reexamination
The two leading explanations for the counterintuitive behavior of interest rates during the Greenback Era (1862â€“1878) â€“ the resumption expectations model of Calomiris (1988) and the capital flow argument of Friedman and Schwartz (1963) â€“ are inconsistent with each other in terms of their treatment of financial arbitrage. A methodology to identify unexploited arbitrage opportunities in financial data is proposed. Observable returns strongly suggest that the money market of the Greenback Era did not systematically admit arbitrage, except possibly around the times of the Gold Corner of 1869 and the Panic of 1873, which implies that Calomiris provides a more plausible explanation.
|Date of creation:||12 Oct 2010|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Journal of Monetary Economics, November 2010, vol. 57 no. 8, pp. 1026-1037|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +1 515.294.6741
Fax: +1 515.294.0221
Web page: http://www.econ.iastate.edu
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genres:32050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Stephanie Bridges)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Stephanie Bridges to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.