IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Do we need social cohesion to be happy?

Listed author(s):
  • KLEIN Carlo
Registered author(s):

    We consider in a first step, that social cohesion will be a determinant of income and, in a second step, income will be a determinant of subjective well-being (SWB) along with social cohesion. We propose to use the weighted Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS) method to estimate our two steps model, based on EVS wave 2008 data for Luxembourg. The impact of social cohesion on SWB is confirmed by the effect of the socio-cultural domain of social cohesion on SWB. The formal character of the political domain, has a positive impact on SWB. Considering the economic aspect of social cohesion we conclude that this domain should be included in any further research studying the relationship between social cohesion and SWB. Nous considérons dans une première étape que la cohésion sociale sera un déterminant du revenu individuel et dans une deuxième étape que le revenu individuel sera un déterminant du bien-être subjectif à côté de la cohésion sociale. Nous proposons d?estimer ce modèle en appliquant la méthode « des triples moindres carrés pondérés (3SLS) » aux données EVS 2008 pour le Luxembourg. L?impact de la cohésion sociale sur le bien-être subjectif est confirmé par l?effet du domaine socio-culturel de la cohésion sociale sur le bien-être subjectif. De même, le caractère formel du domaine politique de la cohésion sociale a un effet positif sur le bien-être subjectif. En considérant l?aspect économique de la cohésion sociale, nous concluons que ce domaine devrait être inclus dans toute recherche future concernant la relation entre cohésion sociale et bien-être subjectif.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by LISER in its series LISER Working Paper Series with number 2011-06.

    in new window

    Length: 28 pages
    Date of creation: Jan 2011
    Handle: RePEc:irs:cepswp:2011-06
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    11, Porte des Sciences, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, G.-D. Luxembourg

    Phone: 00352 / 58 58 55 - 1
    Fax: 00352 / 58 58 55 - 700
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:irs:cepswp:2011-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Library and Documentation)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.