IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc147095.html

The adoption of Generative AI in EU public administrations: exploring individual behaviours and organisational approaches

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping public sector work and accelerating policy debates across Europe. Public administrations are increasingly experimenting with GenAI tools to support document drafting, knowledge management, information processing and service delivery, while simultaneously facing growing challenges related to governance, data protection, organisational readiness and technological sovereignty. Against this background, this report examines how GenAI is being adopted and integrated within European public administrations, through interviews, case studies and a review of the literature. It focuses both on the individual use of the technology by civil servants and on the broader organisational processes required for its strategic assimilation. At the individual level, GenAI adoption is characterised by persistent tensions between empowerment and dependency, innovation and control, and experimentation and regulation. Civil servants increasingly perceive GenAI as a valuable cognitive assistant capable of enhancing productivity, supporting decision-making and improving access to organisational knowledge. At the same time, concerns have emerged regarding reliability, over-reliance, skill erosion, and the widespread use of external commercial tools outside formal organisational channels. At the organisational level, GenAI adoption requires more than the deployment of technological solutions. The assimilation of GenAI encompasses a careful consideration of several key factors: the availability of secure and user-friendly environments, governance capabilities, data and technological infrastructures, workforce skills, and mechanisms for experimentation, monitoring and continuous adaptation. Different assimilation strategies are possible, depending on the type of value administrations aim to generate through GenAI use. Lighter approaches may be sufficient for operational support, while more advanced forms of cognitive augmentation and human–AI collaboration require deeper organisational integration and more strategic governance arrangements. The value-based framework proposed in this report is intended to support reflection on this topic. Building on these findings, administrations and EU Member States should reflect on how to best harness the opportunities offered by GenAI. The report proposes a set of operational policy recommendations to support the responsible, secure and scalable adoption of GenAI in the public sector. Overall, it contributes to the emerging debate on how European public administrations can move from fragmented experimentation towards a more strategic and governed integration of GenAI into administrative processes and public service delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikalef Patrick & Medaglia Rony & Tangi Luca & Rodriguez Müller Paula, 2026. "The adoption of Generative AI in EU public administrations: exploring individual behaviours and organisational approaches," JRC Research Reports JRC147095, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc147095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC147095
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marijn Janssen, 2025. "Responsible governance of generative AI: conceptualizing GenAI as complex adaptive systems," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 44(1), pages 38-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xu & Xie, Fang & Liu, Binbin, 2026. "Governance efficiency and upgrade pathways of international generative AI policies and regulations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Zaidan, Esmat & Truby, Jon & Ibrahim, Imad Antoine & Hoppe, Thomas, 2026. "Hybrid global governance for responsible and inclusive Artificial Intelligence: Proposing a new Sustainable Development Goal 18," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Tengfei Shen & Alina Badulescu, 2025. "Generative AI and Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: Roles of Innovations and AI Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Cordeiro, Cheryl Marie & Adomaitis, Laurynas & Huang, Lei, 2026. "The AI-policy-governance nexus: How regulation and AI shift corporate governance toward stakeholders," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. G. H. B. A. de Silva, 2025. "Data-Driven Framework for Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Inclusive Development in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc147095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.