IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipe/ipetds/1300.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Repetência no Contexto Internacional: O que Dizem os Dados de Avaliações das Quais o Brasil não Participa?

Author

Listed:
  • Sergei Suarez Dillon Soares

Abstract

Brazil is characterized by very high levels of grade repetition. Only Angola suffers from student flow worse than Brazil. There is ample qualitative and quantitative evidence establishing a link between grade repetition and dropping out from school. However, there is little discussion in Brazil of the impact of grade repetition in the international context. The objective of this text is to use data from TIMSS mathematics an science evaluations and PIRLS reading evaluations to estimate the impact of anti-repetition policies upon academic achievement. In order to do this I used both univariate comparisons of countries that have outlawed repetition in primary school with other countries and multivariate regression analysis. The main result is that there is no evidence whatsoever that anti-repetition policies have any negative impact upon children?s academic achievement. On the contrary, regression results show a positive, albeit non-significant, impact of automatic promotion upon test results.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergei Suarez Dillon Soares, 2007. "A Repetência no Contexto Internacional: O que Dizem os Dados de Avaliações das Quais o Brasil não Participa?," Discussion Papers 1300, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/td_1300.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabio Schiavinatto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipeaabr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.