IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipc/opchin/115.html

Empowering or Reinforcing Traditional Roles: Can CCTs Address Gender Vulnerabilities?

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Veras Soares

    (IPC)

  • Elydia Silva

    (IPC)

Abstract

Most conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes in Latin America select a woman as the primary recipient of the transfer. In most cases she is the mother of children in the household or the woman responsible for those children. The rationale behind this is that the money spent by women tends to be concentrated more on goods and services that are more likely to have a positive effect on the children?s well-being. (?)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstra
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Veras Soares & Elydia Silva, 2011. "Empowering or Reinforcing Traditional Roles: Can CCTs Address Gender Vulnerabilities?," One Pager Chinese 115, International Policy Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipc:opchin:115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ipcid.org/sites/default/files/pub/zh-hans/IPCOnePager115.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. -, 2013. "Gender Equality Observatory of Latin America and the Caribbean. Annual report 2012: A look at grants, support and burden for women," Observatorio de Igualdad de Género en América Latina y el Caribe. Estudios, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 35445 edited by Eclac, September.
    3. Omar Ben Haman, 2019. "Conditional and Unconditional Cash Transfer Programs: The Recent Experiences around the World Abstract: Cash transfer programs have become the most popular government welfare paradigm for many develop," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 3(1), pages 210-219, January.
    4. Cecchini, Simone & Madariaga, Aldo, 2011. "Conditional cash transfer programmes: the recent experience in Latin America and the Caribbean," Cuadernos de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 27855 edited by Eclac, June.
    5. Cecilia Parada, 2018. "Income cash transfers and intrahousehold decision making," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 18-17, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    6. Sirojuddin Arif & Muhammad Syukri & Widjajanti Isdijoso & Meuthia Rosfadhila & Bambang Sulaksono, "undated". "Is Conditionality Pro-Women? A Case Study of Conditional Cash Transfer in Indonesia," Working Papers 289, Communications Section.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipc:opchin:115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andre Lyra (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipcunbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.