IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfwpa/2026-161.html

Creditors’ Seniority and Sovereign Risk: Evidence from Debt Composition

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Ferrero
  • Sansan Vincent de Paul Kambou
  • Kady Keita

Abstract

We provide new evidence on the de facto seniority structure of sovereign debt. Using a measure of the Relative Percentage in Default (RPID) by creditor group for 119 low-income and emerging market countries over the period 1980–2022, we show that debt owed to the IMF and the World Bank is, on average, the most senior, followed by debt owed to official bilateral creditors. Private creditors, notably bondholders and commercial banks, are on average junior to official creditors, with commercial banks being the least prioritized group for repayments. Beyond characterizing the seniority hierarchy, our empirical analysis shows that creditor composition has economically meaningful implications for sovereign risk. Using an instrumental variable estimation, we show that IMF credit outstanding as a share of GNI is robustly and negatively associated with the probability of a debt crisis. This stabilizing effect weakens progressively as debt stocks rise, suggesting that the IMF's crisis-preventing role diminishes in situations of severe debt overhang. Turning to sovereign borrowing costs, we find that IMF lending is negatively associated with sovereign bond spreads.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Ferrero & Sansan Vincent de Paul Kambou & Kady Keita, 2026. "Creditors’ Seniority and Sovereign Risk: Evidence from Debt Composition," IMF Working Papers 2026/161, International Monetary Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2026/161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=577611
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2026/161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Akshay Modi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imfffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.