IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfwpa/2026-078.html

Lean and Just? Social Protection Spending and Inequality Outcomes across Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Pienkowski
  • Valentina Semenova
  • Ian C. Stuart
  • Yuntian Lu

Abstract

European governments face tight fiscal constraints amid rising debt and mounting demands from aging, health, defense, and climate spending, while scope to raise taxes is limited. This paper benchmarks the distributional efficiency of non-old-age social protection across Europe using harmonized EU-SILC microdata: defining efficiency as the reduction in the Gini coefficient per euro of transfers. We estimate an efficiency frontier and document large cross-country dispersion: countries with similar spending levels achieve markedly different inequality outcomes. Moving toward the frontier implies potential savings of about 0.7 percent of GDP on average. Complementing this cross-sectional lens, we examine how inequality reduction changes with each additional euro of transfers as coverage extends beyond poorer households. We show that marginal gains typically decline and can eventually turn negative, helping to identify spending components with limited distributional payoff. While social protection serves many important objectives beyond redistribution, our metric provides a transparent, comparable benchmark for assessing where fiscal space may be created with minimal impact on inequality and poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Pienkowski & Valentina Semenova & Ian C. Stuart & Yuntian Lu, 2026. "Lean and Just? Social Protection Spending and Inequality Outcomes across Europe," IMF Working Papers 2026/078, International Monetary Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2026/078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=575333
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2026/078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Akshay Modi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imfffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.