IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfscr/2002-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Czech Republic Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes?Fiscal Transparency Banking Supervision Insurance Regulation Securities Regulation Payment Systems and Monetary and Financial Policy Transparency Updates: Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes—Fiscal Transparency, Banking Supervision, Insurance Regulation, Securities Regulation, Payment Systems, and Monetary and Financial Policy Transparency—Updates

Author

Listed:
  • International Monetary Fund

Abstract

This paper presents an update to the Czech Republic’s Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Fiscal Transparency, Banking Supervision, Insurance Regulation, Securities Regulation, Payment Systems, and Monetary and Financial Policy Transparency. The Czech Republic continues to lack a comprehensive perspective on fiscal risks. Although the extension of government guarantees has dropped sharply, other forms of contingent liabilities are still not fully captured, for example, those resulting from the operations of the National Property Fund or the Czech Consolidation Agency. Moreover, there is no requirement to quantify tax expenditures.

Suggested Citation

  • International Monetary Fund, 2002. "Czech Republic Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes?Fiscal Transparency Banking Supervision Insurance Regulation Securities Regulation Payment Systems and Monetary and Financial Policy Tran," IMF Staff Country Reports 2002/169, International Monetary Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:imf:imfscr:2002/169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=16005
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petr Sedláček, 2006. "Institutional Conditions of Monetary Policy Conduct in the Czech Republic," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(2), pages 113-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imf:imfscr:2002/169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Akshay Modi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imfffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.