IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp01082.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Survey of Strengths and Weaknesses of Senior Executives as Perceived by them and their Juniors

Author

Listed:
  • Rao, T. V.
  • Selvan Tamil S

Abstract

Survey of strengths and weaknesses of senior executives was undertaken in the context of increased use of self-awareness and personal growth programmes in through feedback and counselling. Survey had the objectives of finding out (i) Characteristics or qualities that are perceived by Indian managers as contributing to their effectiveness, (ii) Characteristics or qualities that are perceived as hindering the effectiveness of Indian managers; (iii)Most frequently mentioned strengths of Indian managers as perceived by their subordinates; (iv) Most frequently mentioned weaknesses of Indian managers as perceived by their subordinates and (v) Qualities or characteristics in which there is good degree of agreement in the perceptions of the subordinates. Various characteristics that contribute managerial effectiveness were grouped under six categories: 1. Technical or technological competencies; 2. Managerial and systems competencies; 3. Human relations competencies; 4. Group/team building competencies; 5. Leadership competencies; and 6. Other personal characteristics. It was found that senior executives frequently mentioned managerial and human relations competencies (out of the six said above) as the qualities contributing to managerial effectiveness. Also, of the six categories, personal characteristics and human relations competencies have been identified by the managers as hindrances to effectiveness. Thus we find personal qualities and interpersonal competencies playing a greater role in making a manager to perform effectively. Subordinates have perceived the strengths of their bosses and have stated that their bosses are technically knowledgeable, have planning and decision making skills, delegation ability, communication and motivation skills, leaderships, commitment, hard work and posses other personal characteristics like cool headedness and sincerity. There was agreement in perception relating to strengths like technical knowledge, hardwork, aggressive and cool headedness. In their perception of weaknesses of their bosses, subordinates have identified, poor communication abilities, poor delegation, inability to motivate subordinates and poor planning as some of the weaknesses. There was consistency in the cases of weak in communication, short temperedness and low involvement or aloofness. Subordinates have felt that, improving interpersonal relationship, communication and time management would further enhance the effectiveness of their bosses. Thus, we are able to see a consistency in the case of human relations competency, a competency which both managers as well as subordinates feel is very important for improving managerial effectiveness. As a whole, the study brings out the relevance of personal development and human relations skill to management.

Suggested Citation

  • Rao, T. V. & Selvan Tamil S, 1992. "Survey of Strengths and Weaknesses of Senior Executives as Perceived by them and their Juniors," IIMA Working Papers WP1992-01-01_01082, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.