IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp00615.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incentives and Disincentives in the Indian Family Planning Programme: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Satia J K
  • Maru Rushikesh

Abstract

In view of the national goal to reach a net reproduction rate of 1 by year 2000, there is a growing debate in India about the type of incentives and disincentives for promoting the practice of Family Planning. This paper reviews past experience with respect to incentives-disincentives in the Family Welfare Programme in India. It discusses issues in the implementation of incentives and the current debate on disincentives. Finally, policy issues for the future are presented. The studies revel that the impact on incentives on acceptance of FP is mixed. A higher level of incentive leads to improved performance, but couples are not solely motivated by incentives. Incentives do not seem to have seriously affected quality of acceptance. The implementation of incentives raises questions in respect of quality of services, method-mix of acceptance, implementability of deferred incentives, and effects of motivator incentives. Disincentives pose many legal and ethical issues infringement of basic rights of individuals, impact on quality of life of poor and consequences for the children. The paper argues that for a marked reduction in fertility, a congruence between national and family level benefit-cost relationship of family size is necessary. Any package of incentives-disincentives should, in the long run, help to reduce this lack of congruence. Such a package would, therefore, have to be selective and differ for different segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Satia J K & Maru Rushikesh, 1984. "Incentives and Disincentives in the Indian Family Planning Programme: A Case Study," IIMA Working Papers WP1984-11-01_00615, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.