IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp00453.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Cross-Cultural Study of Teaching effectiveness of the Case Method Versus the Lecture Method of Teaching in Lecture-Oriented Environments: Some Preliminary Findings

Author

Listed:
  • Stuhler Elmar A
  • Misra Sasi B

Abstract

This paper presents some preliminary results of an ongoing study in two West German Universities and the University of the Philippines which examines the comparative effectiveness of the case vs. lecture method of teaching. The specific areas in which the comparative effectiveness of the two methods of teaching are examined are: student performance in terms of assimilation and recall of course material, problem awareness and analysis, students’ attitude towards the subject of study, and interaction structure among students (Flanders Interaction Analysis).

Suggested Citation

  • Stuhler Elmar A & Misra Sasi B, 1981. "A Cross-Cultural Study of Teaching effectiveness of the Case Method Versus the Lecture Method of Teaching in Lecture-Oriented Environments: Some Preliminary Findings," IIMA Working Papers WP1981-09-01_00453, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.