IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp00444.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer Research and Public Policy: The case of Sugar Crisis of 1980

Author

Listed:
  • Mehta Subhash C
  • Chhatopadhyay A
  • Jain B K

Abstract

Based on Consumer Study of Ahmedabad households, conducted immediately after the sugar crisis of 1980, the paper presents the changes that consumer consumption, buying and stocking patterns went through because of the high prices and shortage situation. It points towards reduction in household inventories, lowering of direct consumption at home with little or no effect on outside purchased sugar based products, and increased us e of ration quota by those who earlier cared very little about it. The study attempted to measure the nature and extent of consumer concern about the crisis and indicates that primary effects of excessive consumption. The blame for the crisis was attributed to bad government policies and behaviour of industry and trade. Manipulating by the vested intensity were seen as the major factor and the fact of lower production of the commodity was generally not believed by the consumers. These appeared to be major information and credibility gap between the consumer and the public policy makers and the later failed to evoke public cooperation to tiding over the crisis. The study makes recommendations to the policy makers about free-sale stock releases and the need for a demarketing effort and communication campaign to bridge the yawning gap between public and the public policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehta Subhash C & Chhatopadhyay A & Jain B K, 1981. "Consumer Research and Public Policy: The case of Sugar Crisis of 1980," IIMA Working Papers WP1981-07-01_00444, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.