IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp00394.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agricultural Technology and the Issue of Unequal Distribution of Rewards: An Indian Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Shingi P M
  • Fliegal F C
  • Kivlin J E

Abstract

A sample of 228 Indian farmers were interviewed at two points in time in order to determine the effects of differential acceptance of improved agricultural technology on changes in equality of reward distribution over time. Analysis shows that inequality increases over time with respect to gross agricultural production, but differences in adoption of improved technology are not clearly implicated in that shift. Conversely, inequalities in both level and standard of living are reduced over time. Early failure to adopt agricultural technology does not seem to lead to enduring and self-reinforcing disadvantage in the context studied. Whether such a pattern is typical in the agriculture of developing countries, or whether Indian development policy is responsible for achieving a degree of distributive equity in conjunction with technological change, are among the topics for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Shingi P M & Fliegal F C & Kivlin J E, 1980. "Agricultural Technology and the Issue of Unequal Distribution of Rewards: An Indian Case Study," IIMA Working Papers WP1980-05-01_00394, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.