IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp00357.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effect of Sexual Illustrations on Brandy Product Recall: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mehta Subhash C

Abstract

This research study has attempted to experimentally measure effect of sexual illustrations on brand – product recall. The study is an extension of the work done by M. Steadman and M.W. Alexander and Ben Judd, Jr. Published in Journal of Advertising Research of February 1969 and March 1978 respectively. The study seriously questions the validity of the conclusions arrived at by these authors. The experiment was conducted in a laboratory where 70 subjects in small groups of 10 each were exposed to slide projections of non-sexual ads and sexual ads specially prepared for this research. Later the recall of brands – products and their ability to associate these with the illustration were measured. The recall rates were also co-related with the sex of the subjects and their extent of westernization measured through administration of especially constructed instrument for this purpose. The major findings of the research are: 1. Human illustrations are more effective than landscape scenes. 2. Sexual illustrations are more effective for products where use of sex is consistent with the nature of the product. 3. Female sexual illustrations are more effective when ad is directed towards women. 4. Extreme sexual exposure is recommended only for highly westernized audience. In most cases advertiser would be better off using moderate (or lesser) sexual exposure, consonant with the values of the audience.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehta Subhash C, 1979. "Effect of Sexual Illustrations on Brandy Product Recall: An Experimental Study," IIMA Working Papers WP1979-06-01_00357, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.