IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/14726.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reimagining Legal Practice Under the Advocates Act 1961

Author

Listed:
  • M P Ram Mohan
  • Sidharth Sharma
  • Prem Vinod Parwani

Abstract

Who is called an ‘advocate’ in India – and on what terms is a deeply contested question. This question is tightly regulated by the Bar Council and the Advocates Act 1961, which together reserve the ‘practice of law’ exclusively for those enrolled as ‘advocates.’ This paper interrogates the normative and legal assumptions underlying this exclusion. In doing so, it contrasts India’s framework for legal professionals across different professions, and with those in the UK and US. By tracing the colonial history of the Act alongside its judicial interpretations, we argue that the Act creates a rigid, exclusive regime that is ill-suited to the contemporary realities of the Indian legal profession. The paper concludes by proposing legislative and regulatory reforms to align Indian legal practice with contemporary realities and global best practices.

Suggested Citation

  • M P Ram Mohan & Sidharth Sharma & Prem Vinod Parwani, 2025. "Reimagining Legal Practice Under the Advocates Act 1961," IIMA Working Papers WP 2025-06-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/2025-06/WP-2025-06-01.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.