IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/12789.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Constrained Nash Bargaining Approach to the Stock Rationing Problem in Multi-echelon Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Roy, Debjit
  • Raghavan, N. R. Srinivasa

Abstract

In order to survive in the global volatile market place, supply chain analysts’ are brainstorming to arrive at robust inventory control policies that prevents inventory worth of millions of dollars to get tied up in the chain and at the same time ensures to achieve the differentiated customer service levels. Inventory rationing is a useful strategy to tackle the above problem of conflicting objectives, i.e., minimizing inventory costs (holding costs and backorder costs) and achieving the desired customer service levels. In this paper we consider a multi-echelon supply distribution system and pose the stock allocation problem in a constrained Nash Bargaining (NB) setting. The objective of the model is to determine a set of rationing fractions at the central depot in order to minimize the order-up-to level inventory yet exactly achieving the differentiated target fill rates. It is our firm belief that the Distribution Resource Planning (DRP) managers will find the proposed models a useful tool in their stock allocation decision making process. Rigorous computational experiments suggests that our approach performs better than the existing ones for this important problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Roy, Debjit & Raghavan, N. R. Srinivasa, 2013. "A Constrained Nash Bargaining Approach to the Stock Rationing Problem in Multi-echelon Supply Chains," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-12-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:12789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:12789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.