IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb25-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Significant, but not systemic: The challenge of China's efforts to rival Western financial predominance

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Chorzempa

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Lukas Spielberger

    (Centre for Security, Diplomacy and Strategy-VUB)

Abstract

Despite worldwide concerns about the US dollar, the Chinese renminbi is not yet ready to be a serious contender for leading international currency status. This Policy Brief examines three of the most important Chinese approaches to increasing the renminbi's role as an international settlement currency: promote bilateral swap agreements between the People's Bank of China and other central banks; create international payment systems that do not involve the dollar, most notably the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System; and develop a central bank digital currency for alternative payment infrastructures. The authors find that Beijing's efforts fall short of posing a systemic challenge to the dollar or to infrastructures like SWIFT. Nevertheless, these approaches have enabled China to use its currency for bilateral foreign policy. US and European policymakers should consider countering or attenuating these efforts, even though they have had limited success in increasing renminbi usage. This Policy Brief has been copublished with the Centre for Security, Diplomacy and Strategy-VUB.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Chorzempa & Lukas Spielberger, 2025. "Significant, but not systemic: The challenge of China's efforts to rival Western financial predominance," Policy Briefs PB25-4, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb25-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/2025/significant-not-systemic-challenge-chinas-efforts-rival-western
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb25-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.