IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ifs/ifsewp/99-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What can we learn about pension reform from Generational Accounts for the UK?

Author

Listed:
  • James Banks

    () (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University of Manchester)

  • Richard Disney

    () (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University of Sussex)

  • Zoe Oldfield

    () (Institute for Fiscal Studies and Institute for Fiscal Studies)

Abstract

This paper considers the relevance of a set of generational accounts in informing policy debate in the UK. With regard to transparency, Generational Accounts can, under sensible assumptions, provide a useful summary statistic to supplement our analysis of government policy. Interpreting differences in the accounts across groups as measures of the incidence or redistributiveness of existing or proposed policies is more problematic. With respect to UK pension reform, within-cohort differences raise important issues. Finally we argue that past pension reforms have been characterised by inaccurate forecasts as opposed to a lack of understanding of the generational incidence of proposed policy.

Suggested Citation

  • James Banks & Richard Disney & Zoe Oldfield, 1999. "What can we learn about pension reform from Generational Accounts for the UK?," IFS Working Papers W99/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:99/16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp9916.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Banks & Carl Emmerson, 2000. "Public and private pension spending: principles, practice and the need for reform," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 1-63, March.
    2. Ásta Herdís Hall & Sólveig Frída Jóhannsdóttir, 2002. "Generational Equality in Iceland," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 28, pages 27-42.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:99/16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Emma Hyman). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.