IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Uncovering some causal relationships between inequality and economic growth

Listed author(s):
  • Philippe Aghion

    ()

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies and Harvard University)

  • Eve Caroli

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

  • Cecilia Garcia-Penalosa

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

The question of how inequality is generated and how it reproduces over time has been a major concern for social scientists for more than a century. Yet the relationship between inequality and the process of economic development is far from being well understood. In particular, for the past forty years conventional economic wisdom on inequality and growth has been dominated by two fallacies. On the effect of inequality on growth in market economies, the standard argument is that inequality is necessarily good for incentives and therefore good for growth, although incentive and growth considerations might (sometimes) be traded off against equity or insurance aims. On the reverse causal relationship from growth to inequality, the conventional wisdom is that inequality should obey the so-called Kuznets hypothesis whereby income inequality and GNP per head have an inverted U-shaped relation. The aim of this survey is to challenge the conventional wisdoms on inequality and growth, which cannot explain recent empirical evidence. Our analysis remains within the framework of neoclassical economics. However, the introduction of additional aspects such as credit market imperfections, moral hazard, non-neutral technical and organisational change, and labour market institutions, gives a more complex and, we believe, more realistic picture of the relationship between inequality and economic growth.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ifs.org.uk
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Institute for Fiscal Studies in its series IFS Working Papers with number W98/02.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 16 Aug 1998
Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:98/02
Contact details of provider: Postal:
The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE

Phone: (+44) 020 7291 4800
Fax: (+44) 020 7323 4780
Web page: http://www.ifs.org.uk
Email:


More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE
Email:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:98/02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Emma Hyman)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.