IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Household Negotiation and Labor Supply: Evidence from the BHPS

Listed author(s):
  • Andrew Clark



  • Hélène Couprie


    (Greqam, Université de la Méditerranéée)

  • Catherine Sofer


    (TEAM, Université Paris 1, Maison des Sciences Economiques)

In this paper, we estimate a collective model of household labour supply à la Chiappori on British two-earner couples, using data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS). We find that family members do not pool their resources: the unitary model is rejected. We estimate a sharing rule representing the negotiation process inside the household, introducing a number of original distribution factors, such as political and religious involvement and parents’ occupational level. We do not find any significant impact of marriage market opportunities on the balance of power inside the couple. We emphasise that the sharing rule should be interpreted carefully when analysing intra-family inequality issues.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France in its series IDEP Working Papers with number 0201.

in new window

Length: 30 pages
Date of creation: 24 May 2002
Date of revision: 24 May 2002
Handle: RePEc:iep:wpidep:0201
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2, rue de la Charité 13002 Marseille

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iep:wpidep:0201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Yves Doazan)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.