IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ico/wpaper/44.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Neoliberal Think Tanks as (new) actors in Austrian socio-political discourses. The case of the Hayek Institute and Agenda Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Puehringer
  • Christine Stelzer-Orthofer

    (Institute for Social and Societal Politics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

Abstract

Austrian chancellor Schuessel's right wing-conservative administration during the early 2000s induced a number of neoliberal reforms, resting on the strict dichotomy of state and politics vs. markets and private enterprise. Whereas the former in this conception is characterized as inefficient, static and uneconomic, the latter is euphemistically attributed with liberty, efficiency and dynamics. After this far-reaching neoliberal turn Austrian neoliberal during the last years think tanks increasingly have enter ed socio-political discourses. In this article , applying a social network analysis, on the one hand we demonstrate the close interconnections of think tanks like e.g. the Hayek Institute and the Agenda Austria in existing market radical networks of economic potent actors and employers' associations. On the other hand we employ a discourse analysis framework focusing on documents of think tanks self-representation and media response in opinion-leading newspapers in order to show that neoliberal think tanks are more and more becoming an integral part of a "discourse coalition" (Hajer) for the dismantling of the Austrian welfare state.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Puehringer & Christine Stelzer-Orthofer, 2016. "Neoliberal Think Tanks as (new) actors in Austrian socio-political discourses. The case of the Hayek Institute and Agenda Austria," ICAE Working Papers 44, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jku.at/fileadmin/gruppen/108/ICAE_Working_Papers/wp44.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teresa Griesebner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igjkuat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.