IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Can we compare SMS marketing to traditional marketing communications?

Listed author(s):
  • Roozen, Irene


    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium)

  • Genin, Emile


    (Significant GfK, Heverlee, Belgium)

Registered author(s):

    Nowadays most companies acknowledge the importance of SMS marketing in reaching and interacting with their customers (Kavassalis et al. 2003; Dickinger et al. 2004; Tsang, Ho & Liang 2004; Sharl, Dickinger & Murphy 2005; Muk 2007). However, there is much discussion in the press regarding the effectiveness when it comes to SMS marketing. Are customers willing to accept, reading and using SMS messages: how effective is SMS marketing compared to traditional marketing communications? The goal of this study is to investigate, on the one hand, the effectiveness of SMS advertising compared to traditional marketing communication for different aspects and, on the other hand, to analyse to what extent consumers are willing to accept commercial messages on their mobile phone, since the effectiveness of SMS marketing highly depends on this. The research results indicate that location and time, incentive, advertising appeal and product involvement have a significant positive influence on the attitude towards the ad, the attitude towards the brand and the consumers’ purchase intention for SMS advertising and not for the traditional marketing communications. In addition, the research results indicate that an incentive is necessary (especially for young mobile phone users) to increase the willingness to accept these kind of messages.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management in its series Working Papers with number 2008/50.

    in new window

    Length: 29 pages
    Date of creation: Oct 2008
    Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200850
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabine Janssens)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.