IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hub/wpecon/200850.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can we compare SMS marketing to traditional marketing communications?

Author

Listed:
  • Roozen, Irene

    () (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium)

  • Genin, Emile

    () (Significant GfK, Heverlee, Belgium)

Abstract

Nowadays most companies acknowledge the importance of SMS marketing in reaching and interacting with their customers (Kavassalis et al. 2003; Dickinger et al. 2004; Tsang, Ho & Liang 2004; Sharl, Dickinger & Murphy 2005; Muk 2007). However, there is much discussion in the press regarding the effectiveness when it comes to SMS marketing. Are customers willing to accept, reading and using SMS messages: how effective is SMS marketing compared to traditional marketing communications? The goal of this study is to investigate, on the one hand, the effectiveness of SMS advertising compared to traditional marketing communication for different aspects and, on the other hand, to analyse to what extent consumers are willing to accept commercial messages on their mobile phone, since the effectiveness of SMS marketing highly depends on this. The research results indicate that location and time, incentive, advertising appeal and product involvement have a significant positive influence on the attitude towards the ad, the attitude towards the brand and the consumers’ purchase intention for SMS advertising and not for the traditional marketing communications. In addition, the research results indicate that an incentive is necessary (especially for young mobile phone users) to increase the willingness to accept these kind of messages.

Suggested Citation

  • Roozen, Irene & Genin, Emile, 2008. "Can we compare SMS marketing to traditional marketing communications?," Working Papers 2008/50, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lirias.hubrussel.be/handle/123456789/2268
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabine Janssens). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/emhubbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.