IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/99-soc-2021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determinants Of Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy And Resistance In Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Yana Roshchina

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Sergey Roshchin

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Ksenia Rozhkova

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

Vaccination is the main tool available to handle the COVID-19 pandemic globally. Though no vaccine is proven to be 100% effective, vaccination secures against getting seriously ill and dying from the disease. Russia announced the development of its first domestic vaccine back in August 2020 and launched the nationwide immunization campaign at the beginning of 2021. Despite these achievements, as for mid-October 2021, only 36% of the population got at least one shot of the vaccine. Massive vaccination hesitancy and refusal pose a great threat to public health and postpone social and economic recovery. Using nationally representative data from the general adult population of Russia, this study explores the scope of vaccination hesitancy and refusal as well as the determinants of vaccination attitudes. The results suggest that only 45% of Russian population demonstrated positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination prior the launch of nationwide vaccination. We analyze a wide array of demographic, socio-economic, and health-related factors in relation to vaccination intentions. We also explore the deep-rooted causes of vaccination reluctance by looking at personality traits, religiosity, and trust. The obtained results are vital for designing policy measures to promote vaccination as a “fourth wave” of COVID-19 in Russia is currently progressing.

Suggested Citation

  • Yana Roshchina & Sergey Roshchin & Ksenia Rozhkova, 2021. "Determinants Of Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy And Resistance In Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 99/SOC/2021, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:99/soc/2021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2021/12/21/1776447206/99SOC2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md Arif Billah & Md Mamun Miah & Md Nuruzzaman Khan, 2020. "Reproductive number of coronavirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on global level evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Mohammedjud Hassen Ahmed & Shuma Gosha Kanfe & Mohammedamin Hajure Jarso, 2021. "Intention to receive vaccine against COVID-19 and associated factors among health professionals working at public hospitals in resource limited settings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yubin Lee & Byung-Woo Kim & Shin-Woo Kim & Hyunjin Son & Boyoung Park & Heeyoung Lee & Myoungsoon You & Moran Ki, 2021. "Precautionary Behavior Practices and Psychological Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients and Quarantined Persons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Facundo Piguillem & Liyan Shi, 2022. "Optimal Covid-19 Quarantine and Testing Policies," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(647), pages 2534-2562.
    3. P. Battiston & M. Menegatti, 2022. "Interaction in Prevention: A General Theory and an Application to COVID-19 Pandemic," Economics Department Working Papers 2022-EP02, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    4. Kirsten Vanderplanken & Stephan Van den Broucke & Isabelle Aujoulat & Joris Adriaan Frank van Loenhout, 2021. "The Relation between Perceived and Actual Understanding and Adherence: Results from a National Survey on COVID-19 Measures in Belgium," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-10, September.
    5. David Howarth, 2023. "English tort law and the pandemic: the dog that has not barked," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 48(3), pages 577-607, July.
    6. Bibha Dhungel & Md. Shafiur Rahman & Md. Mahfuzur Rahman & Aliza K. C. Bhandari & Phuong Mai Le & Nushrat Alam Biva & Stuart Gilmour, 2022. "Reliability of Early Estimates of the Basic Reproduction Number of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Isabella Locatelli & Bastien Trächsel & Valentin Rousson, 2021. "Estimating the basic reproduction number for COVID-19 in Western Europe," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-9, March.
    8. Atsushi Miyawaki & Yusuke Tsugawa, 2022. "Health and Public Health Implications of COVID‐19 in Asian Countries," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 17(1), pages 18-36, January.
    9. Yun Jo & Andy Hong & Hyungun Sung, 2021. "Density or Connectivity: What Are the Main Causes of the Spatial Proliferation of COVID-19 in Korea?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Bjarke Frost Nielsen & Kim Sneppen & Lone Simonsen & Joachim Mathiesen, 2021. "Differences in social activity increase efficiency of contact tracing," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(10), pages 1-11, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    COVID-19; coronavirus; vaccination attitudes; vaccination hesitancy; vaccination resistance; risk attitudes; personality traits; Russia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:99/soc/2021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.