IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/90-law-2019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role Of The Court Of Justice Of The European Union In The Development Of The Common Foreign And Security Policy After The Treaty Of Lisbon

Author

Listed:
  • Kirill Entin

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Yulia Belous

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

This study investigates the involvement of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the development of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) after the Treaty of Lisbon. The preliminary results reveal that the competence of the CJEU in CFSP is limited because EU member states (MS) avoid extending the principle of direct effect and other acquis of the CJEU in this field. On the basis of the integration through law concept it has been demonstrated that the CJEU (in the realm of rulings as provided by the Treaties) can rule in a way that would almost certainly have an impact on how CFSP is being implemented. This paper provides a reconstruction of the case law in the field and the prospects for integration through legal development

Suggested Citation

  • Kirill Entin & Yulia Belous, 2019. "The Role Of The Court Of Justice Of The European Union In The Development Of The Common Foreign And Security Policy After The Treaty Of Lisbon," HSE Working papers WP BRP 90/LAW/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:90/law/2019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2019/09/24/1539989811/90LAW2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Court of Justice of the European Union; CJEU; common foreign and security policy; CFSP; Treaty of Lisbon; integration through law;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:90/law/2019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.