IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Coherence in Aphasia: Implementation of Different Measurement Procedures


  • Mariya V. Khudyakova

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Maria M. Shapiro

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Maria A.Grabovskaya

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Maria A. Alexeeva

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)


Coherence is a semantic property of the text to make sense to readers or listeners and is crucial for any text. Various coherence measures have been developed for assessment of discourse abilities in different clinical populations. However, the results of decades of research on coherence of speech of individuals with brain damage have yielded contradictive results. We suggest that this might be due to the different sensitivity of the methods. In this study we two measures of global coherence and five measures of local coherence on the same set of texts by healthy speakers of Russian and people with dynamic aphasia in order to find which methods allow to distinguish between the two groups and how these results correlate. The material for the study is texts from the Russian CliPS corpus which is a collection of oral retellings of the pear film by individuals with brain damage and healthy speakers of Russian language

Suggested Citation

  • Mariya V. Khudyakova & Maria M. Shapiro & Maria A.Grabovskaya & Maria A. Alexeeva, 2016. "Coherence in Aphasia: Implementation of Different Measurement Procedures," HSE Working papers WP BRP 48/LNG/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:48/lng/2016

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    coherence; discourse macrostructure; aphasia; oral corpora;

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:48/lng/2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamil Abdulaev) or (Victoria Elkina). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.