IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ignoramus et ignorabimus”? Does contemporary antiphysicalism have a positive program?


  • Diana Gasparyan

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Philosophy Department (Ontology, Logic and Epistemology))


This article attempts to find out whether the contemporary antiphysicalism has a positive program. Using the approaches of such contemporary analytical philosophers as Colin McGinn, Joseph Levine, Noam Chomsky, Thomas Nagel, and David Chalmers, the author evaluates the ratio of negative and positive components in modern antiphysicalistic approaches, and determines the role of skepticism in their theories. To what extent can antiphysicalism withstand physicalism, and is physicalism in spite of its faults in a better position, since it offers, admittedly imperfect answers, while antiphysicalism does not offer anything other than criticism of the existing theories?

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Gasparyan, 2013. "Ignoramus et ignorabimus”? Does contemporary antiphysicalism have a positive program?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 38/HUM/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:38hum2013

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Mokhtarian, Patricia L & Salomon, Ilan & S, Lothlorien, 2001. "Understanding the Demand for Travel: It's Not Purely 'Derived'," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5bh2d8mh, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. N. Lesca, 2011. "Introduction," Post-Print halshs-00640604, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    mind-body problem; skepticism; antiphysicalism; physicalism; cognitive closure; explanatory gap; mysteries and problems; mysterianism in the philosophy of mind; philosophy of mind; McGinn; Levin; Chomsky; Nagel; Chalmers.;

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:38hum2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamil Abdulaev) or (Victoria Elkina). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.