A “de Soto Effect” in Industry? Evidence from the Russian Federation
The empirical literature assessing the connection between land rights, access to finance and investment activity has focused largely on actors that, for multiple reasons, might face difficulties accessing credit. Communities of small-scale farmers or poor urban households in developing countries, that is, may not be the best place to look for evidence as to whether more secure land rights are sufficient to facilitate borrowing by providing borrowers with a collateralizable asset. We explore this relationship in a setting in which financial market frictions are apt to be less severe – i.e., among large, urban, industrial enterprises. Exploiting policy-induced variation across Russian regions, we use recently-collected survey data to show that private rights to land do indeed facilitate access to external financing and promote investment. This finding is supplemented by additional survey evidence that points to private land serving as an important source of collateral.
|Date of creation:||2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in WP BRP Series: Economics / EC, November 2012, pages 1-33|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.hse.ru/Email:
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:19/ec/2012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamil Abdulaev)or (Victoria Elkina)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.