IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hic/resdes/3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mortality after the 2003 invasion of Iraq: Were valid and ethical field methods used in this survey?

Author

Listed:
  • Madelyn Hsiao-Rei Hicks

    () (King's College London)

Abstract

The Lancet has published the methodology and findings of a 2006 survey by Gilbert Burnham and colleagues of mortality after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The authors report that 40 households were interviewed a day in this survey, and illustrate the ease of this completion rate by comparison to their 2004 study in which teams interviewed 30 households in three hours (completing on average one interview every 6 minutes). This paper describes in detail the problems presented by this reported rapid interviewing rate: inadequacy of the timeframe, likely compromise to data validity, increased risk to interviewees, and the improbability of maintaining ethical standards for academic epidemiological research. Conflict-related mortality surveys should be based on valid field methods that systematically maintain an ethical relationship with the population being represented. It is suggested that Burnham and colleagues need to provide a fully detailed methodological description of their study coupled with access to their raw data to establish that these standards were met for their survey in Iraq.

Suggested Citation

  • Madelyn Hsiao-Rei Hicks, 2006. "Mortality after the 2003 invasion of Iraq: Were valid and ethical field methods used in this survey?," HiCN Research Design Notes 3, Households in Conflict Network.
  • Handle: RePEc:hic:resdes:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hicn.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/rdn3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hic:resdes:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alia Aghajanian) or () or () or (). General contact details of provider: http://www.hicn.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.