IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Viden om effekten af brugerbetaling i almen praksis og lægevagten




In Denmark GP services are free at the point of use. A looming conflict between GPs and the payor, the Danish Regions, has raised the possibility of copayment during a possible upcoming conflict. Danish empirical evidence on the demand effect of copayment is largely nonexisting. However, from October 1st 1984 to January 5th 1985 there was period with about 40% copayment. Results from the few analyses of the demand effects during this period are summarized. The average copayment for the period was 40% the remaing 60% was reimbursed if an invoice was presented to the municipal office. The total number of contacts decreased with between 4050%. The demand for outofhours service decreased with about the same percentage. The demand for services from a hospital A&E department increased with about 24%. Demand for services from office based specialist decreased with about 10% due to a reduced number of referrals. For office based specialists where referral from GP was not needed the demand was largely unaffected, if anything a slight increase. The 4050% decrease in quantity demanded is not, however, an equilibrium level, in that that the income level of GPs is reduced and most likely will lead to a price adjustment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedersen, Kjeld Møller, 2013. "Viden om effekten af brugerbetaling i almen praksis og lægevagten," COHERE Working Paper 2013:3, University of Southern Denmark, COHERE - Centre of Health Economics Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2013_003

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    co-payment; demand for health services;

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:sduhec:2013_003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Terkel Christiansen). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.