IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/oslohe/2010_005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nyere metoder: Hvordan prioritere helsetiltak bår både effekter og kostnader er usikre?

Author

Listed:
  • Moger, Tron Anders

    (Department of Health Management and Health Economics)

  • Guttormsen, Atle G.

    (Department of Health Management and Health Economics)

  • Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø

    (Department of Health Management and Health Economics)

Abstract

I denne artikkelen drøfter forfatterne bruk av nyere metoder innen økonomisk evaluering som samfunnet kan bruke for å prioritere mellom ulike behandlinger der både effektene og kostnadene er usikre. Tradisjonelt har man brukt p-verdier når man skal vurdere om én behandling er bedre enn en annen. I et eksempel som benytter metoder fra moderne cost-effectiveness analyser, viser vi at dette ikke alltid er en god metode for prioritering mellom helsetiltak. Fokus på p-verdier kan medføre at samfunnet tar beslutninger som med stor sannsynlighet er i strid med samfunnets målsetting med helsetjenesten.

Suggested Citation

  • Moger, Tron Anders & Guttormsen, Atle G. & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø, 2010. "Nyere metoder: Hvordan prioritere helsetiltak bår både effekter og kostnader er usikre?," HERO Online Working Paper Series 2010:5, University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:oslohe:2010_005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hero.uio.no/publicat/2010/2010_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    økonomisk evaluering; p-verdi; behandlingskostnader; cost-effectiveness; simulering; verdi av liv; legemiddel;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:oslohe:2010_005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristi Brinkmann Lenander (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/heuiono.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.