IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/oruesi/2025_011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Continuous Scoring Function for Confidence-Based Marking using Multiple Choice Questions

Author

Listed:

Abstract

In most multiple-choice tests using confidence based marking (CBM), a discrete certainty scale is applied, often with three or four probability intervals of equal length. In this paper we derive a continuous certainty scale for CBM which we think circumvents the alleged complexity that would be inherent in a continuous scale. In our approach, the examinee, given a correct answer, is awarded the same number of points as her reported degree of confidence that her chosen alternative is the correct answer, i.e., the examinee’s uncertainty is directly reflected in terms of the number of points achieved if the answer is correct. We test our continuous scoring scheme in an examination in basic statistics at our university. The results indicate that most students are quite good at assessing their confidence levels, but students tend on average to overrate their confidence for high levels of stated confidence and underrate their confidence for low levels of stated confidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Karlsson, Niklas & Lunander, Anders, 2025. "A Continuous Scoring Function for Confidence-Based Marking using Multiple Choice Questions," Working Papers 2025:11, Örebro University, School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2025_011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oru.se/globalassets/oru-sv/institutioner/hh/workingpapers/workingpapers2025/wp-11-2025.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2025_011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieoruse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.