IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nierwp/0065.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does International Harmonization of Environmental Policy Instruments Make Economic Sense? The Case of Paper Recycling in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Huhtala, Anni

    () (National Institute of Economic Research)

  • Samakovlis, Eva

    () (Umeå Universitet, Departments of Economics, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

Abstract

Harmonization of the instruments used in environmental policy has been considered necessary to guarantee fair competition in international markets. We investigate alternative policy measures for promoting paper recycling in seven European countries and present a theoretical framework for analyzing policy requirements for the minimum amount of recycled material to be used in production. We estimate empirically the technologically feasible input combinations of pulp and waste paper for paper production. We then "translate" the standard into market-based instruments to illustrate how a common recycling goal could be implemented in different countries through taxes or subsidies. Finally, we discuss the distributional effects of harmonized policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Huhtala, Anni & Samakovlis, Eva, 1999. "Does International Harmonization of Environmental Policy Instruments Make Economic Sense? The Case of Paper Recycling in Europe," Working Papers 65, National Institute of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nierwp:0065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.konj.se/download/18.4bf39736154c6660a1097576/1463753785992/WP_65.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Berglund, Christer & Soderholm, Patrik, 2003. "Complementing Empirical Evidence on Global Recycling and Trade of Waste Paper," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 743-754, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nierwp:0065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sarah Hegardt Grant). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/kongvse.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.